Featured Posts

  

Dispatches From the Crossroads

Rss

Common Ground

Posted by: BIO Ventures for Global Health on 12/9/2009

What ties together someone who works on a disease like Chagas, leishmaniasis, or lymphatic filariasis and someone who works on Rett syndrome or multiple myeloma? Your first thought might be ‘Not much.’ But an interesting group called FasterCures brought 600 of us together in New York last week to find out.

I mention Rett syndrome because I sat next to two parents of girls suffering from the disease during one of the meeting’s lunches. The symptoms of this rare disorder appear after an early period of apparently normal or near normal development until six to 18 months of life, when there is a slowing down or stagnation of skills. A period of regression then follows when the child loses communication skills and purposeful use of her hands. Over time, motor problems may increase, but eye contact and communication generally improve.

I sat there at lunch feeling the pain of these two parents and yet also knowing that the diseases that BIO Ventures for Global Health address result in hundreds of millions of cases of illness, millions of deaths a year, and untold amounts of human misery and poverty. But for all our disparities, the meeting’s attendees shared a feeling that the biomedical enterprise is not focused in a powerful enough way, or perhaps not designed, to cure diseases. The “aha” moment for new drugs, vaccines, and diagnostics may come from academic labs, research foundations, or government labs—but the machinery to turn them into products that can make a difference in peoples’ lives lies almost exclusively within industry.

The business model that has brought us needed drugs, vaccines, and diagnostics for as long as we can remember is an industry in crisis. This presents both a challenge and an opportunity. Opportunities previously seen as “niche” markets make more economic sense to companies if foundations, patient advocacy groups, and governments have created the infrastructure to “de-risk” the endeavor for companies. The lure of emerging markets is making the globe smaller and making companies rethink how they will need to play in these markets and still profit. Success surely will not come through ignoring diseases associated with inequity and poverty.

In the end, what drew the attendees together was the imperative for patient need to be at the center of the search for new drugs, vaccines, and diagnostics; the recognition that we are all players in the search for cures and that we all have a need to find creative and flexible solutions; and an utter lack of patience with bureaucracy and inaction. There is an illusion that not doing something is the safest path to take. But in biomedical research, inactivity and passivity results in death.

Melinda Moree is the interim CEO of BIO Ventures for Global Health

Categories: Meetings
Create a trackback from your own site.
|   Blog Home

0 Comments

Leave A Comment

CAPTCHA image
Please enter the CAPTCHA phrase above.
 

  

Recent Comments

by Chad on Coffee Break
"It is really sad that third-world countries suffer so much from an assortment of diseases and we tend to live without worrying about it. Only in a perfect world could the public and privates sectors work together as a "super-power" to recognize and fix these problems, but as of the current economic conditions it seems to be fading even more. Honestly, this is such a sad moment for everyone!" Read more »

by Yina on A Shifting Paradigm?
"As a long time agent of change in the Healthcare space, I have seen the under uliaizttion of technology. It is not bleeding edge' technology that causes me concern but the more mature ones that have been poorly driven and implemented. Much of this can be attributed to the Change Management plan. We fail to fully vet pilot sites, we jam data and processing into the pipe without taking avantage of future implementations, we include the directly affected stakeholders long after implementation starts and we don't analyze the impact on systems and layered products needed for success. The resourcing and uliaizttion of analysts, technical tactitions and workflow specialtists is arduous and expensive (and often considered unnecessary). However, the reengineering of applications and lost hours due to disruption at the user end needs to be added to the cost algorithm. After all even a medium sized system implementation failure creates grief for anyone else trying to affect change in the same user environment." Read more »

by Christian on Crossing the Valley of Death
"If the NIH could find a way to get the CAN funded then we could get some more research and development on the way. Congress just needs to approve the funding for this project. Thanks..." Read more »