Featured Posts

  

Dispatches From the Crossroads

Rss

Operation Translation

Posted by: BIO Ventures for Global Health on 3/14/2011
Sometimes it seems as though the researchers working on R&D for neglected diseases of the developing world and the biotech companies whose innovative technologies have revolutionized health care in the developed world are speaking two different languages. For the past seven years, BIO Ventures for Global Health (BVGH) has been trying to do something about that by helping companies in the biotech industry learn the language of neglected diseases. But more needs to be done. Companies want to get involved in global health R&D, but are not sure where their technologies are needed. Rather than talking parasites, pestilence, and plagues, companies talk PCR, biological pathways, and cell mediated immunity. What drug targets or vaccine technologies are relevant to neglected diseases that are also part of the biotech vocabulary for more familiar diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, or Alzheimer’s?

Well, consider this your translation. On Wednesday, BVGH launched its updated Global Health Primer. Through a series of target and technology profiles, the 2011 Global Health Primer directs the biotech reader from familiar drug targets and vaccine technologies associated with developed world diseases to the most relevant neglected diseases. The reader can then go on to learn more about product needs and opportunities through disease specific profiles. With the launch of the new Global Health Primer online interface, our hope is that the biotech and global health communities can use the common language of science to explore innovative solutions to prevent, diagnose, and treat neglected diseases.

In total, the BVGH Global Health Primer contains 15 neglected disease profiles and 12 target/technology profiles. These profiles include 297 products or research programs that are actively being developed by 113 unique organizations. Several large pharmaceutical companies now have global health programs, and interest and awareness of neglected diseases from biotech companies is increasing. However, the majority of new products for neglected diseases that have come to market in the last ten years are for just two diseases: HIV and malaria. Through the Global Health Primer, we hope to drive companies to explore the full spectrum of neglected disease product needs.

The Global Health Primer provides information for action. We hope that biopharmaceutical companies will find the information here to apply their innovative technologies to solving global health problems, and that global health researchers use the Primer to identify new areas or programs relevant to their important work. Together we can save lives in the developing world.

Elizabeth Ponder is Manager, Scientific Affairs, at BIO Ventures for Global Health.
Robert Schendle is Manager, Knowledge Systems, at BIO Ventures for Global Health.
Categories: News Partnering
Create a trackback from your own site.
|   Blog Home

0 Comments

Leave A Comment

CAPTCHA image
Please enter the CAPTCHA phrase above.
 

  

Recent Comments

by Chad on Coffee Break
"It is really sad that third-world countries suffer so much from an assortment of diseases and we tend to live without worrying about it. Only in a perfect world could the public and privates sectors work together as a "super-power" to recognize and fix these problems, but as of the current economic conditions it seems to be fading even more. Honestly, this is such a sad moment for everyone!" Read more »

by Yina on A Shifting Paradigm?
"As a long time agent of change in the Healthcare space, I have seen the under uliaizttion of technology. It is not bleeding edge' technology that causes me concern but the more mature ones that have been poorly driven and implemented. Much of this can be attributed to the Change Management plan. We fail to fully vet pilot sites, we jam data and processing into the pipe without taking avantage of future implementations, we include the directly affected stakeholders long after implementation starts and we don't analyze the impact on systems and layered products needed for success. The resourcing and uliaizttion of analysts, technical tactitions and workflow specialtists is arduous and expensive (and often considered unnecessary). However, the reengineering of applications and lost hours due to disruption at the user end needs to be added to the cost algorithm. After all even a medium sized system implementation failure creates grief for anyone else trying to affect change in the same user environment." Read more »

by Christian on Crossing the Valley of Death
"If the NIH could find a way to get the CAN funded then we could get some more research and development on the way. Congress just needs to approve the funding for this project. Thanks..." Read more »