Featured Posts

  

Dispatches From the Crossroads

Rss

The Most Important Hire in Global Health

Posted by: BIO Ventures for Global Health on 8/31/2010
The hire that will define the future of developing and making available new drugs, vaccines, and diagnostics for poor countries will occur sometime in the next few months and I hope that we are all watching closely — very closely. The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations (GAVI) will need a new CEO, since it has announced that he will be leaving the position in October.

I call this out as a pivotal hire because GAVI not only has a critical mission — get vaccines to poor children to save lives — but it is also a canary signaling when the overall system for innovation and access to lifesaving technologies for the poor may be in trouble. The new social responsibility contract is based on the idea that if companies and other product developers are going to invest and work on products for the poor that bring them little financial return, then the public sector will ensure that cost-effective products that improve the health will have a way to get to those populations. This implied contract demands that corporations step up to use their assets to address unmet medical needs in developing countries, while making two demands of the public sector: (1) produce the funds to buy these products (at deeply discounted rates) for those who cannot afford them, and (2) develop systems to ensure that cost-effective, lifesaving products are made accessible to those in need.

There is not a better story in global health than the story of vaccines. There are new lifesaving vaccines that are ready to go into children’s arms (such as the rotavirus and pneumococcal vaccines), and the pipeline is bursting with vaccines in late stage development that, if successful, could radically change the impact we could have on the biggest killers of children around the world (including a malaria vaccine in phase 3 trials that has already demonstrated impact against clinical and severe malaria). The early success of GAVI in greatly accelerating the uptake of existing vaccines in the poorest countries fueled a treasure trove of new innovation for neglected diseases by small and large pharmaceutical companies.

But the canary is sick. The initial burst of support and funding for GAVI has stalled, as have GAVI’s efforts to get new vaccines to children in need. Rotavirus and pneumococcal vaccines were approved for inclusion in GAVI programs years ago and despite an Advance Market Commitment that raised $1.5 billion dollars to pay for pneumococcal vaccines, these vaccines are still largely unavailable. If GAVI incorporated all the currently available cost-effective, lifesaving vaccines into its programs, it would face a deficit of billions of dollars. Donor governments are for the most part showing little sense of urgency in ensuring that children in the developing world receive these lifesaving products. If the public sector fails to translate these medical breakthroughs into lives saved, it will have a chilling effect on the entire innovation system that we depend on to bring forward the lifesaving drugs, vaccines, and diagnostics that could improve health, and help countries to move out of the cycle of poor health and poverty. 

So, GAVI Board — we encourage you to be bold in your hiring. Not only are the children of the world depending on you to make a good choice, all the players in the innovation and access communities are looking to you for a choice that will lead us all into a new era of ensuring that all people benefit from the medical breakthroughs that address their health needs. Your boldness will have a ripple effect on the entire field of global health, and fuel the virtuous cycle that turns medical innovations into the improved health and well-being of the poor.

Melinda Moree is CEO at BIO Ventures for Global Health
Categories: News
Create a trackback from your own site.
|   Blog Home

2 Comments

Sep 05 2010, 3:33 PM simon
I'd like to comment on the fact that the term "cost-effective" vaccines is not meaningful, since cost-effectiveness always depends on the Willigness to Pay of a given coutnry (which WHO recommends to be 1-3xGDP per capita). E.g. while in UK a medicines/vaccine that has incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 43,000-130,000 USD/QALY will be considered "cost-effective", it will not be the case in India where the threshold is 1-3xGDP=1,000-3,000 USD/QALY. It means that the same vaccine would need to be 43x cheaper in India than in UK to be cost-effective. I believe that the future of developing countries will depend on their ability to develop vaccines locally and sell them at local prices. I am currently involved in a research project in India which aims at understanding the challenges of entrepreneurship and its role in affordable healthcare in the future. Best regards
Sep 21 2010, 2:01 AM Online IT Training Courses
Yes, this hire is not oriented to general health issues. It’s concerning the vital diseases of kids. It needs a big involvement and understanding of enrolled members.
Leave A Comment

CAPTCHA image
Please enter the CAPTCHA phrase above.
 

  

Recent Comments

by Christian on Crossing the Valley of Death
"If the NIH could find a way to get the CAN funded then we could get some more research and development on the way. Congress just needs to approve the funding for this project. Thanks..." Read more »

by Christian Kaisan on Crossing the Valley of Death
"Thank you for your interesting blog article. The congress should approve the urgently needed aid money very soon." Read more »

by Gordon on Guiding the Voucher
"Glad to see an effort is made to improve the standards global healthcare. There is a general negative perception of drug and pharmaceutical companies because of the money hungry image they sometimes show. I hope that by working with BVGH, they can right that image, and prove that they too want to benefit the less fortunate and make healthcare more affordable to developing countries. " Read more »