Featured Posts

  

Dispatches From the Crossroads

Rss

Meeting the Need: New Diagnostic Tests for the Developing World

Posted by: BIO Ventures for Global Health on 4/26/2010
In the United States, we have high expectations for our diagnostics. Lipid profiles, urine analysis, and HIV CD4 counts are requested stat. If a person might be anemic, iron levels are checked immediately. And if there’s the slightest chance a woman might be pregnant, she expects a home pregnancy test to confirm or deny a pregnancy pronto.

Though I am making light of our impatience, accurate diagnosis can be the difference between life and death for serious conditions—which is why the lack of effective diagnostics in poor countries is such a problem.

BIO Ventures for Global Health has focused its newest report, The Diagnostics Innovation Map: Medical Diagnostics for the Unmet Needs of the Developing World, on the groundbreaking technologies that are paving the way for rapid, accurate diagnoses in the developing world. The report highlights companies that represent some of the most innovative in their approach and whose technologies have the greatest potential for changing the paradigm for how diseases are diagnosed and treated in the developing world.

In the developing world, essential diagnostics are often not available to patients or health care providers. In Africa, more than 70% of the population lives in a setting with minimal health care infrastructure or without regular access to electricity or clean water, laboratory facilities, or trained health workers. In such an environment, diagnostics must be simple, easy-to-use, resource efficient, robust, low-cost, and able to be administered at the point of patient care. Many existing diagnostics—tests that are used every day in the developed world—are unusable in resource-poor settings, creating a tremendous need for new technologies suitable for the developing world.

Yet investment in diagnostics research and development (R&D) is low. Diagnostics R&D receives far less funding than drug or vaccine R&D. In fact, according to the George Institute 2009 G-FINDER report, Neglected Disease Research and Development: New Times, New Trends, less than five percent of annual R&D funding for neglected diseases is allocated for diagnostics. In 2008, a total of $2.96 billion was spent on global health R&D and only $119 million of that went to diagnostic research.

New pathways for how to fund and organize the development of new point-of-care diagnostics are also critically needed. Current grant mechanisms, while important, do not stimulate the collaboration of enough organizations with the full range of expertise needed to develop these new innovations into diagnostic tests appropriate for the diseases and health care conditions of the developing world.

A new pay-for-success financial incentive could lead to greater success in developing these types of tests.

There is a tremendous need for new diagnostics—and for greater investment in diagnostics R&D. At BIO Ventures for Global Health, we believe that we can advance groundbreaking diagnostics for the developing world with the creation of incentives that provide a return on investment to companies. Working together, we can find market-based solutions that will speed the development of diagnostics for the world’s poorest, and thus improve health outcomes for those most in need.

For more information, please contact BIO Ventures for Global Health at info@bvgh.org. Visit the BVGH Web site to read the report online.

Thayer Hardwick is a research analyst at BIO Ventures for Global Health.
Categories: Incentives News
Create a trackback from your own site.
|   Blog Home

0 Comments

Leave A Comment

CAPTCHA image
Please enter the CAPTCHA phrase above.
 

  

Recent Comments

by Chad on Coffee Break
"It is really sad that third-world countries suffer so much from an assortment of diseases and we tend to live without worrying about it. Only in a perfect world could the public and privates sectors work together as a "super-power" to recognize and fix these problems, but as of the current economic conditions it seems to be fading even more. Honestly, this is such a sad moment for everyone!" Read more »

by Yina on A Shifting Paradigm?
"As a long time agent of change in the Healthcare space, I have seen the under uliaizttion of technology. It is not bleeding edge' technology that causes me concern but the more mature ones that have been poorly driven and implemented. Much of this can be attributed to the Change Management plan. We fail to fully vet pilot sites, we jam data and processing into the pipe without taking avantage of future implementations, we include the directly affected stakeholders long after implementation starts and we don't analyze the impact on systems and layered products needed for success. The resourcing and uliaizttion of analysts, technical tactitions and workflow specialtists is arduous and expensive (and often considered unnecessary). However, the reengineering of applications and lost hours due to disruption at the user end needs to be added to the cost algorithm. After all even a medium sized system implementation failure creates grief for anyone else trying to affect change in the same user environment." Read more »

by Christian on Crossing the Valley of Death
"If the NIH could find a way to get the CAN funded then we could get some more research and development on the way. Congress just needs to approve the funding for this project. Thanks..." Read more »