Invest. Engage. Save.

Rss

Sharing the Wealth

Posted by: BIO Ventures for Global Health on 2/2/2010
Intellectual property (IP) is prized in research and development. It is the only way to legally protect your ideas and investments, and it serves as an incentive that inspires innovation and promotes scientific progress—you come up with a novel, valuable idea and you earn the rights to it. The IP system was devised for products that have commercial value, which means that sometimes it doesn’t work as well for products with high social value but little or no commercial value. This has been the subject of much ideological debate but little pragmatic action.

But sometimes, individuals and companies decide to act to share intellectual property for the public good. At BIO Ventures for Global Health, we believe in the power of intellectual property and what it can do to accelerate innovation in general, and also for global health. That’s why we recently announced that we are partnering with GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), and Alnylam to engage the global health community in using the powerful resources of the GSK and Alnylam Knowledge Pool. The Knowledge Pool was formed in February 2009 to aid in the discovery and development of new medicines for the treatment of 16 neglected tropical diseases, as defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, in the world’s least developed countries. By adopting a more accessible approach to intellectual property, the Pool facilitates access to compounds and technologies and, most importantly, industrial know-how for organizations that want to conduct research on treatments for these neglected diseases.

The primary objective of the Knowledge Pool is to help those innovative non-profits and academic research centers working on developing products for neglected diseases to speed up their efforts by accessing the patents, technologies, and product development expertise available in the Knowledge Pool. For many of these academic and global health non-profit groups, however, intellectual property can be perceived as preventing rather than enabling their work. At BIO Ventures for Global Health, we are committed to using our new role as administrator of the Knowledge Pool to closing this cultural gap and ensuring maximum utility of the Pool’s resources and expertise to benefit the public good.

To carry out this role, we are organizing disease-specific meetings that identify the gaps in expertise and intellectual property that currently exist in product development for neglected diseases. We will help global health researchers work with the resources of the Knowledge Pool to fill these gaps so that the resources generously made available by companies will be used to create medicines for neglected diseases faster and more efficiently. We are excited to accelerate the use of this important resource so that industry and global health researchers can work together toward the critical common goal of saving millions of lives in poor countries.

Read the BIO Ventures for Global Health press release here.
Categories: Incentives News
Create a trackback from your own site.
|   Blog Home

1 Comment

Aug 16 2010, 9:47 AM Elderly alert systems
I had no better idea about BIO Ventures for Global Health until I read this post. This has helped me to know more about a company who has right focus and aim to move forward in the future. I would agree with your points and would provide you with full support for the measure you have taken to provide a healthy world around you.
Leave A Comment

Please enter the CAPTCHA phrase above.
 

  
  

Recent Comments

by php flash chat on Speed Dating to Save Lives
"It was my first visit to your blog, but I admire time and effort you put into it! I have enjoyed reading many of your articles, looks like you are a professional writer! Well done! James, " Read more »

by simon on The Most Important Hire in Global Health
"I'd like to comment on the fact that the term "cost-effective" vaccines is not meaningful, since cost-effectiveness always depends on the Willigness to Pay of a given coutnry (which WHO recommends to be 1-3xGDP per capita). E.g. while in UK a medicines/vaccine that has incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 43,000-130,000 USD/QALY will be considered "cost-effective", it will not be the case in India where the threshold is 1-3xGDP=1,000-3,000 USD/QALY. It means that the same vaccine would need to be 43x cheaper in India than in UK to be cost-effective. I believe that the future of developing countries will depend on their ability to develop vaccines locally and sell them at local prices. I am currently involved in a research project in India which aims at understanding the challenges of entrepreneurship and its role in affordable healthcare in the future. Best regards " Read more »

by Mark H on Trademark of Innovation
"Often the pharmaceutical companies are seen as evil because they do not do enough to help the poor by giving away medicines or licence rights. But we must consider two things: 1 they are commecial companies and have legal obligations towards their shareholders i.e. their prime concern is making money 2 these companies invest a vastly greater amount of money in R&D than the government. As a result their R&D occasionally finds cures inadvertently for other diseases - even if they are not actively trying to create the right medicine. So how do you create an incentive for the most effective creator of new innovative cures whose primary goal is to make money (like all companies)? Well the answer seems obvious - reward them with tax benefits that would help push them above their competitors. Whilst you could argue that this would prevent the government from reaping the benefits (tax) you could also say that the competition created would drive innovation and spending in the private sector which would improve the economy. A win win win situation - pharmaceuticals, government, developing countries!" Read more »

  

Tag Cloud