Invest. Engage. Save.

Rss

California, Here We Come!

Posted by: BIO Ventures for Global Health on 7/20/2010
We’re heading west! This week BIO Ventures for Global Health (BVGH) announced that it is opening a new headquarters office in the heart of the San Francisco financial district. As we work to attract new companies to global health and guide companies already working in the space, we rely on our discussions with biotech leaders to help shape programs and strategies. The new office, located in one of the biggest biotech hubs in the country, gives BVGH the opportunity to get critical feedback on new programs we are developing or policy proposals we are putting forth. This will allow us to better target our work. The proximity to the biotech community on both coasts will also allow BVGH staff to use our time (and the time of the people we meet with) more effectively.

Our team is also expanding. We’ve added two new senior staff and a scientific manager. We will introduce you to them in a future blog post. In the meantime, you can check out their bios on our Web site. The new team members will be directing two of our key projects that are growing quickly –Global Health Connect and the Pool for Open Innovation against Neglected Tropical Diseases.

There’s also important work to be done on the East Coast, so we will be maintaining our strong ties with the East Coast biotech community through our D.C office. The D.C. team didn’t get away without having to pack a few boxes, though. We’ve moved to the Dupont Circle area.

Addresses for both offices are on the Contact page.

Read more about the BVGH expansion here.

Jennifer Manganello is a Development Associate at BIO Ventures for Global Health.
Categories: News
Create a trackback from your own site.
|   Blog Home

1 Comment

Jul 27 2010, 5:19 AM over50dating
Greatpost...thanks for sharing such a wonderful writeup
Leave A Comment

Please enter the CAPTCHA phrase above.
 

  
  

Recent Comments

by php flash chat on Speed Dating to Save Lives
"It was my first visit to your blog, but I admire time and effort you put into it! I have enjoyed reading many of your articles, looks like you are a professional writer! Well done! James, " Read more »

by simon on The Most Important Hire in Global Health
"I'd like to comment on the fact that the term "cost-effective" vaccines is not meaningful, since cost-effectiveness always depends on the Willigness to Pay of a given coutnry (which WHO recommends to be 1-3xGDP per capita). E.g. while in UK a medicines/vaccine that has incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 43,000-130,000 USD/QALY will be considered "cost-effective", it will not be the case in India where the threshold is 1-3xGDP=1,000-3,000 USD/QALY. It means that the same vaccine would need to be 43x cheaper in India than in UK to be cost-effective. I believe that the future of developing countries will depend on their ability to develop vaccines locally and sell them at local prices. I am currently involved in a research project in India which aims at understanding the challenges of entrepreneurship and its role in affordable healthcare in the future. Best regards " Read more »

by Mark H on Trademark of Innovation
"Often the pharmaceutical companies are seen as evil because they do not do enough to help the poor by giving away medicines or licence rights. But we must consider two things: 1 they are commecial companies and have legal obligations towards their shareholders i.e. their prime concern is making money 2 these companies invest a vastly greater amount of money in R&D than the government. As a result their R&D occasionally finds cures inadvertently for other diseases - even if they are not actively trying to create the right medicine. So how do you create an incentive for the most effective creator of new innovative cures whose primary goal is to make money (like all companies)? Well the answer seems obvious - reward them with tax benefits that would help push them above their competitors. Whilst you could argue that this would prevent the government from reaping the benefits (tax) you could also say that the competition created would drive innovation and spending in the private sector which would improve the economy. A win win win situation - pharmaceuticals, government, developing countries!" Read more »

  

Tag Cloud