Invest. Engage. Save.

Rss

Meeting the Need: New Diagnostic Tests for the Developing World

Posted by: BIO Ventures for Global Health on 4/26/2010
In the United States, we have high expectations for our diagnostics. Lipid profiles, urine analysis, and HIV CD4 counts are requested stat. If a person might be anemic, iron levels are checked immediately. And if there’s the slightest chance a woman might be pregnant, she expects a home pregnancy test to confirm or deny a pregnancy pronto.

Though I am making light of our impatience, accurate diagnosis can be the difference between life and death for serious conditions—which is why the lack of effective diagnostics in poor countries is such a problem.

BIO Ventures for Global Health has focused its newest report, The Diagnostics Innovation Map: Medical Diagnostics for the Unmet Needs of the Developing World, on the groundbreaking technologies that are paving the way for rapid, accurate diagnoses in the developing world. The report highlights companies that represent some of the most innovative in their approach and whose technologies have the greatest potential for changing the paradigm for how diseases are diagnosed and treated in the developing world.

In the developing world, essential diagnostics are often not available to patients or health care providers. In Africa, more than 70% of the population lives in a setting with minimal health care infrastructure or without regular access to electricity or clean water, laboratory facilities, or trained health workers. In such an environment, diagnostics must be simple, easy-to-use, resource efficient, robust, low-cost, and able to be administered at the point of patient care. Many existing diagnostics—tests that are used every day in the developed world—are unusable in resource-poor settings, creating a tremendous need for new technologies suitable for the developing world.

Yet investment in diagnostics research and development (R&D) is low. Diagnostics R&D receives far less funding than drug or vaccine R&D. In fact, according to the George Institute 2009 G-FINDER report, Neglected Disease Research and Development: New Times, New Trends, less than five percent of annual R&D funding for neglected diseases is allocated for diagnostics. In 2008, a total of $2.96 billion was spent on global health R&D and only $119 million of that went to diagnostic research.

New pathways for how to fund and organize the development of new point-of-care diagnostics are also critically needed. Current grant mechanisms, while important, do not stimulate the collaboration of enough organizations with the full range of expertise needed to develop these new innovations into diagnostic tests appropriate for the diseases and health care conditions of the developing world.

A new pay-for-success financial incentive could lead to greater success in developing these types of tests.

There is a tremendous need for new diagnostics—and for greater investment in diagnostics R&D. At BIO Ventures for Global Health, we believe that we can advance groundbreaking diagnostics for the developing world with the creation of incentives that provide a return on investment to companies. Working together, we can find market-based solutions that will speed the development of diagnostics for the world’s poorest, and thus improve health outcomes for those most in need.

For more information, please contact BIO Ventures for Global Health at info@bvgh.org. Visit the BVGH Web site to read the report online.

Thayer Hardwick is a research analyst at BIO Ventures for Global Health.
Categories: Incentives News
Create a trackback from your own site.
|   Blog Home

0 Comments

Leave A Comment

Please enter the CAPTCHA phrase above.
 

  
  

Recent Comments

by simon on The Most Important Hire in Global Health
"I'd like to comment on the fact that the term "cost-effective" vaccines is not meaningful, since cost-effectiveness always depends on the Willigness to Pay of a given coutnry (which WHO recommends to be 1-3xGDP per capita). E.g. while in UK a medicines/vaccine that has incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 43,000-130,000 USD/QALY will be considered "cost-effective", it will not be the case in India where the threshold is 1-3xGDP=1,000-3,000 USD/QALY. It means that the same vaccine would need to be 43x cheaper in India than in UK to be cost-effective. I believe that the future of developing countries will depend on their ability to develop vaccines locally and sell them at local prices. I am currently involved in a research project in India which aims at understanding the challenges of entrepreneurship and its role in affordable healthcare in the future. Best regards " Read more »

by Mark H on Trademark of Innovation
"Often the pharmaceutical companies are seen as evil because they do not do enough to help the poor by giving away medicines or licence rights. But we must consider two things: 1 they are commecial companies and have legal obligations towards their shareholders i.e. their prime concern is making money 2 these companies invest a vastly greater amount of money in R&D than the government. As a result their R&D occasionally finds cures inadvertently for other diseases - even if they are not actively trying to create the right medicine. So how do you create an incentive for the most effective creator of new innovative cures whose primary goal is to make money (like all companies)? Well the answer seems obvious - reward them with tax benefits that would help push them above their competitors. Whilst you could argue that this would prevent the government from reaping the benefits (tax) you could also say that the competition created would drive innovation and spending in the private sector which would improve the economy. A win win win situation - pharmaceuticals, government, developing countries!" Read more »

by BIO Ventures for Global Health on Ready to Go
"Thanks so much for your interest, Trudy. We are not currently working with the Carter Center but we are interested in speaking with them to gain epidemiological information for our Global Health Primer, and so hope to be working together in the future. " Read more »

  

Tag Cloud